Jan Choinski vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Choinski vs N. Fatic

Jan Choinski

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

227

C. Rank

240

126

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$285.0K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'5" (196 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

227

C. Rank

240

126

Best Rank

191

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$285.0K

Career Money

$74.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Choinski 1 - 0 Fatic

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jan Choinski winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Jan Choinski and Nerman Fatic was at the Maia Challenger, 01-12-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jan Choinski getting the victory 6-3 4-2 ret..

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Choinski	1
Fatic	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) Maia Challenger(12-01-22)

Stats

Jan Choinski

Nerman Fatic

J. Choinski vs N. Fatic H2H Profile

J. Choinski	Stats	N. Fatic
$285,015	Career Prize Money	$73,995
58.82% (407-285)	Career Total W/L	58.35% (395-282)
1	Clay	0
16	Titles	11
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

J. Choinski vs N. Fatic Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jan Choinski has won 46.58% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jan Choinski, in recent form, has won 43.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 43.50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.32% and 28.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jan Choinski has saved 59.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 55.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jan Choinski has won 53.45% of matches played (W/L 31/ 27), with Nerman Fatic winning 74.60% (W/L 31/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jan Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 237/ 142), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 6/ 17). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 335/ 216), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
Player level: In the last year, Jan Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.41% of matches (W/L 31/ 23), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jan Choinski winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jan Choinski winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Jan Choinski and Nerman Fatic was at the Maia Challenger, 01-12-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jan Choinski getting the victory 6-3 4-2 ret..
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:18.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jan Choinski has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.74 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 353.73.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jan Choinski has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 94% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jan Choinski has converted 28.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 34.81% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jan Choinski vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Choinski vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Choinski	Stats	N. Fatic
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
10	Games Won	5
2	Aces (Total)	2
0	Total Double Faults	2
1:23:18	Avg. Match Time	1:23:18
68% (32/47)	1st Serve %	65% (28/43)
72% (23/32)	1st Serve Win %	68% (19/28)
53% (8/15)	2nd Serve Win %	27% (4/15)
60% (3/5)	Break Pts Won %	50% (1/2)
47% (20/43)	Return Pts Won %	34% (16/47)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Choinski Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bad Waltersdorf Challenger - 15-09-2025
QF Francesco PassaroF. Passaro	W	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
R2 Marko TopoM. Topo	W	2-6 6-1 7-6(6)	Stats
R1 Vitaliy SachkoV. Sachko	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 08-09-2025
R1 Vitaliy SachkoV. Sachko	L	7-5 4-6 6-3	Stats
Tulln Challenger - 01-09-2025
R2 Joel SchwaerzlerJ. Schwaerzler	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, ECU-BIH 3-2 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 2 Alvaro Guillen MezaA. Guillen	L	6-4 7-6(0)	Stats
Sofia 1 Challenger - 11-08-2025
SF Zdenek KolarZ. Kolar	L	6-0 ret.	Stats
QF Sebastian GimaS. Gima	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R2 Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiL. Emanuel	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Kilian FeldbauschK. Feldbausch	W	6-7(4) 6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Choinski vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Choinski	Stats	N. Fatic
58.82% (407/285)	YTD Win/Loss	58.35% (395/282)
56.91% (914/692)	Sets Win/Loss	57.34% (871/648)
52.93% (7946/7065)	Games Win/Loss	52.95% (7438/6608)
53.10% (60/53)	Hard Win/Loss	50.62% (41/40)
62.53% (237/142)	Clay Win/Loss	60.80% (335/216)
58.76% (104/73)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.19% (19/24)
26.09% (6/17)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
0.26	Aces Per Game	0.22
1910	Aces Total	1524
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.22
985	Total Double Faults	1482
1:21:40	Average Match Time	1:19:41
479.82	Average Opponent Rank	510.46
65% (25860/39658)	1st Serve %	67% (23258/34907)
68% (17534/25860)	1st Serve Win %	65% (15200/23258)
52% (7112/13798)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (5586/11649)
43% (1752/4033)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1915/4096)
40% (16043/39787)	Return Points Win %	43% (15212/35219)
31.58% (6/13)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
33.33% (1/2)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	40.00% (4/6)
35.71% (10/18)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (3/9)
54.28% (165/139)	Challenger W/L	53.21% (116/102)
66.57% (225/113)	Futures W/L	62.88% (271/160)
59% (395/672)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (386/650)
45% (5/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/3)
52% (102/197)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (79/154)
53% (116/218)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (101/186)
88% (388/343)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (385/340)
12% (388/45)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (385/41)
21% (303/63)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (292/56)